Bail - Revision history

Sysop: /* PC12022.1 On bail enhancement */

2025-11-18T02:33:17Z

PC12022.1 On bail enhancement

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:33, 18 November 2025
Line 44:		Line 44:

	If a felony with a PC12022.1 on-bail enhancement is reduced to a misdemeanor under Prop 47, the PC12022.1 enhancement disappears. (People v. Buycks (2018) 5 Cal.5th 857, 896, citing People v. Buycks (2015) 241 Cal.App.4th 519.)		If a felony with a PC12022.1 on-bail enhancement is reduced to a misdemeanor under Prop 47, the PC12022.1 enhancement disappears. (People v. Buycks (2018) 5 Cal.5th 857, 896, citing People v. Buycks (2015) 241 Cal.App.4th 519.)

			If the primary offense pleads out to a misdemeanor, then no PC12022.1 enhancement. (''People v. Reyes'' (2016) 3 Cal.App.5th 1222, 1227.)

			Determination of whether primary offense is a felony is at time of sentencing. (''People v. Smith'' (2006) 142 Cal.App.4th 923, 935, fn. 4.)

	An arrest for the secondary offense is required for the on-bail enhancement to be imposed. Arrest means "the defendant is taken into custody for the commission of the secondary offense." (''In re Mazur'' (2022) 81 Cal.App.5th 203, 210.)		An arrest for the secondary offense is required for the on-bail enhancement to be imposed. Arrest means "the defendant is taken into custody for the commission of the secondary offense." (''In re Mazur'' (2022) 81 Cal.App.5th 203, 210.)

Sysop: /* PC12022.1 On bail enhancement */

2024-05-05T16:14:04Z

PC12022.1 On bail enhancement

@@ Line 35: / Line 35: @@
 ==PC12022.1 On bail enhancement==
 This is a two-year enhancement for committing a crime while released on bail or own recognizance. Subdivision (c) specifically states that the allegation may be pleaded in a Complaint, but need not be proved at the preliminary hearing. The allegation must, however, be pleaded in the Information or Indictment
@@ Line 58: / Line 61: @@
 )	and that he was taken into custody for the commission of Count YYYY”

Sysop: /* PC12022.1 On bail enhancement */

2024-02-05T02:09:12Z

PC12022.1 On bail enhancement

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:09, 5 February 2024
Line 46:		Line 46:
	''People v. Johnson'' (2012) 208 Cal.App.4th 1092, held that even after ''Apprendi'', a defendant does not have a right to a jury trial on the on-bail enhancement, because it falls within the prior conviction exception. However, ''Johnson'' relied upon a series of California cases that were overruled by People v. Gallardo (2017) 4 Cal.5th 120.		''People v. Johnson'' (2012) 208 Cal.App.4th 1092, held that even after ''Apprendi'', a defendant does not have a right to a jury trial on the on-bail enhancement, because it falls within the prior conviction exception. However, ''Johnson'' relied upon a series of California cases that were overruled by People v. Gallardo (2017) 4 Cal.5th 120.

	''People v. Smith'' (2006)		''People v. Smith'' (2006) held that the conviction of the primary offense is not an element of the enhancement that has to be found by a jury.

	The appropriate jury instruction is CALCRIM 3250.		The appropriate jury instruction is CALCRIM 3250.

Sysop: /* PC12022.1 On bail enhancement */

2024-02-03T15:54:01Z

PC12022.1 On bail enhancement

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:54, 3 February 2024
Line 45:		Line 45:

	''People v. Johnson'' (2012) 208 Cal.App.4th 1092, held that even after ''Apprendi'', a defendant does not have a right to a jury trial on the on-bail enhancement, because it falls within the prior conviction exception. However, ''Johnson'' relied upon a series of California cases that were overruled by People v. Gallardo (2017) 4 Cal.5th 120.		''People v. Johnson'' (2012) 208 Cal.App.4th 1092, held that even after ''Apprendi'', a defendant does not have a right to a jury trial on the on-bail enhancement, because it falls within the prior conviction exception. However, ''Johnson'' relied upon a series of California cases that were overruled by People v. Gallardo (2017) 4 Cal.5th 120.

			''People v. Smith'' (2006)

			The appropriate jury instruction is CALCRIM 3250.

			“If you find the defendant guilty of the crime charged in Count XXX, you must then decide whether the People have proved the additional allegation that at the time of the commission of Count YYYY, that the Defendant was released from custody on bail or his own recognizance for Count XXXX,

			To prove this allegation, the People must prove that

			1) At the time the Defendant committed the acts alleged in Count YYYY, he had been released from custody on bail or on his or her own recognizance pending trial for Count XXX,
			and

			2) and that he was taken into custody for the commission of Count YYYY”

Sysop: /* PC12022.1 On bail enhancement */

2024-02-03T15:52:06Z

PC12022.1 On bail enhancement

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:52, 3 February 2024
Line 43:		Line 43:

	An arrest for the secondary offense is required for the on-bail enhancement to be imposed. Arrest means "the defendant is taken into custody for the commission of the secondary offense." (''In re Mazur'' (2022) 81 Cal.App.5th 203, 210.)		An arrest for the secondary offense is required for the on-bail enhancement to be imposed. Arrest means "the defendant is taken into custody for the commission of the secondary offense." (''In re Mazur'' (2022) 81 Cal.App.5th 203, 210.)

			''People v. Johnson'' (2012) 208 Cal.App.4th 1092, held that even after ''Apprendi'', a defendant does not have a right to a jury trial on the on-bail enhancement, because it falls within the prior conviction exception. However, ''Johnson'' relied upon a series of California cases that were overruled by People v. Gallardo (2017) 4 Cal.5th 120.

Sysop: /* PC12022.1 On bail enhancement */

2024-02-03T15:48:06Z

PC12022.1 On bail enhancement

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:48, 3 February 2024
Line 41:		Line 41:

	If a felony with a PC12022.1 on-bail enhancement is reduced to a misdemeanor under Prop 47, the PC12022.1 enhancement disappears. (People v. Buycks (2018) 5 Cal.5th 857, 896, citing People v. Buycks (2015) 241 Cal.App.4th 519.)		If a felony with a PC12022.1 on-bail enhancement is reduced to a misdemeanor under Prop 47, the PC12022.1 enhancement disappears. (People v. Buycks (2018) 5 Cal.5th 857, 896, citing People v. Buycks (2015) 241 Cal.App.4th 519.)

			An arrest for the secondary offense is required for the on-bail enhancement to be imposed. Arrest means "the defendant is taken into custody for the commission of the secondary offense." (''In re Mazur'' (2022) 81 Cal.App.5th 203, 210.)

Sysop: /* On bail enhancement */

2024-02-03T15:42:35Z

On bail enhancement

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:42, 3 February 2024
Line 34:		Line 34:
	FTA is in itself a crime. It does not matter what happened on the underlying offense. (''People v. Walker'' (2002) 29 Cal.4th 577, 583 ["The language and history of section 1320.5 also reflect the Legislature's view that fulfillment of this purpose requires punishment whether or not the defendant ultimately is convicted of the charge for which he or she was out on bail when failing to appear in court as ordered."].)		FTA is in itself a crime. It does not matter what happened on the underlying offense. (''People v. Walker'' (2002) 29 Cal.4th 577, 583 ["The language and history of section 1320.5 also reflect the Legislature's view that fulfillment of this purpose requires punishment whether or not the defendant ultimately is convicted of the charge for which he or she was out on bail when failing to appear in court as ordered."].)

	==On bail enhancement==		==PC12022.1 On bail enhancement==

			This is a two-year enhancement for committing a crime while released on bail or own recognizance. Subdivision (c) specifically states that the allegation may be pleaded in a Complaint, but need not be proved at the preliminary hearing. The allegation must, however, be pleaded in the Information or Indictment

	On bail for a case outside of California counts as being on bail. (''People v. Griffin'' (2005) 128 Cal.App.4th 1112.)		On bail for a case outside of California counts as being on bail. (''People v. Griffin'' (2005) 128 Cal.App.4th 1112.)

			If a felony with a PC12022.1 on-bail enhancement is reduced to a misdemeanor under Prop 47, the PC12022.1 enhancement disappears. (People v. Buycks (2018) 5 Cal.5th 857, 896, citing People v. Buycks (2015) 241 Cal.App.4th 519.)

Sysop at 15:18, 14 October 2021

2021-10-14T15:18:30Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:18, 14 October 2021
Line 1:		Line 1:
	"The California Supreme Court has recognized that release on bail and OR release are separate and distinct procedures." (''Williams v. County of San Joaquin'' (1990) 225 Cal.App.3d 1326, citing ''Van Atta v. Scott'' (1980) 27 Cal.3d 424, 452 ["Release on own recognizance and release on bail are alternative and complementary systems"]]		"The California Supreme Court has recognized that release on bail and OR release are separate and distinct procedures." (''Williams v. County of San Joaquin'' (1990) 225 Cal.App.3d 1326, citing ''Van Atta v. Scott'' (1980) 27 Cal.3d 424, 452 ["Release on own recognizance and release on bail are alternative and complementary systems"]]



	==Bail==		==Bail==


	==Own Recognizance (OR) Release==		==Own Recognizance (OR) Release==
Line 9:		Line 9:
	PC1318 defines the legal agreement for OR Release.		PC1318 defines the legal agreement for OR Release.


			==Bail or OR conditions==

			In re Webb

	===Compliance with PC1318 by written agreement===		===Compliance with PC1318 by written agreement===

Sysop at 02:10, 17 May 2017

2017-05-17T02:10:34Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:10, 17 May 2017
Line 29:		Line 29:

	FTA is in itself a crime. It does not matter what happened on the underlying offense. (''People v. Walker'' (2002) 29 Cal.4th 577, 583 ["The language and history of section 1320.5 also reflect the Legislature's view that fulfillment of this purpose requires punishment whether or not the defendant ultimately is convicted of the charge for which he or she was out on bail when failing to appear in court as ordered."].)		FTA is in itself a crime. It does not matter what happened on the underlying offense. (''People v. Walker'' (2002) 29 Cal.4th 577, 583 ["The language and history of section 1320.5 also reflect the Legislature's view that fulfillment of this purpose requires punishment whether or not the defendant ultimately is convicted of the charge for which he or she was out on bail when failing to appear in court as ordered."].)

			==On bail enhancement==
			On bail for a case outside of California counts as being on bail. (''People v. Griffin'' (2005) 128 Cal.App.4th 1112.)

Sysop: /* Own Recognizance (OR) Release */

2016-02-29T02:24:19Z

Own Recognizance (OR) Release

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:24, 29 February 2016
Line 14:		Line 14:

	"Similar to a bail bond being in the nature of a contract between the government and the surety that ensures the appearance of the defendant ([citation].), an OR written agreement is a contract between government and the defendant in which the defendant not only promises to appear, but is informed of the consequences of nonappearance." ''(People v. Mohammed'' (2008) 162 Cal.App.4th 920.)		"Similar to a bail bond being in the nature of a contract between the government and the surety that ensures the appearance of the defendant ([citation].), an OR written agreement is a contract between government and the defendant in which the defendant not only promises to appear, but is informed of the consequences of nonappearance." ''(People v. Mohammed'' (2008) 162 Cal.App.4th 920.)

			===Penal Code section 1318===

			(a) The defendant shall not be released from custody under an own recognizance until the defendant files with the clerk of the court or other person authorized to accept bail a signed release agreement which includes:
			:(1) The defendant’s promise to appear at all times and places, as ordered by the court or magistrate and as ordered by any court in which, or any magistrate before whom the charge is subsequently pending.
			:(2) The defendant’s promise to obey all reasonable conditions imposed by the court or magistrate.
			:(3) The defendant’s promise not to depart this state without leave of the court.
			:(4) Agreement by the defendant to waive extradition if the defendant fails to appear as required and is apprehended outside of the State of California.
			:(5) The acknowledgment of the defendant that he or she has been informed of the consequences and penalties applicable to violation of the conditions of release.

	==Failure to Appear (FTA)==		==Failure to Appear (FTA)==