Plea bargains - Revision history

Sysop: Redirected page to Plea bargain

2025-05-25T02:35:37Z

Redirected page to Plea bargain

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:35, 25 May 2025
Line 1:		Line 1:
			#REDIRECT [[Plea bargain]]
	~~==Judge withdrawing approval==~~

	~~People v. Pixley~~ [~~https://www.courts.ca.gov/opinions/documents/E075758.PDF~~]


	“While plea bargaining offers an intelligent and economically necessary solution to the practical problems which arise in the administration of the criminal justice system, plea bargains themselves should not offend the fundamental notions of justice and criminal liability and accountability which underlie that system. Moreover, the practical benefits of plea bargaining should never outweigh the public's interest in the vigorous prosecution of the accused, the imposition of appropriate punishment, and the protection of victims of crimes.” People v. Cardoza (1984) 161 Cal.App.3d 40, 43:




	~~Clark v. Superior 2005 WL 2375165 F047630~~

	Since Mikhail involved a plea to a lesser included offense, that court had no occasion to discuss the effect of section 1192.1 et seq. on lesser related offenses. Accordingly, we construe that court's reference to “an unconditional plea to a lesser offense or degree than that originally charged” (Mikhail, supra, 13 Cal.App.4th at p. 857) as alluding to an unconditional plea to a lesser included offense.

	~~We note that here, unlike in Mikhail, the prosecutor did not object to the court's rejection of the plea. (See Mikhail, supra, 13 Cal.App.4th at pp. 851-852.)~~

	~~People v. Martinez, F050714~~

	~~People v. Drummond, A119118~~

	~~People v. Segura (2008) 44 Cal.4th 921~~

	~~People v. Cardoza (1984) 161 Cal.App.3d 40~~

	~~People v. Orin (1975) 13 CaL.3d 937~~

	~~People v. Thomas, A097987~~

Sysop: /* Judge withdrawing approval */

2024-05-19T00:05:50Z

Judge withdrawing approval

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:05, 19 May 2024
Line 25:		Line 25:

	People v. Orin (1975) 13 CaL.3d 937		People v. Orin (1975) 13 CaL.3d 937

			People v. Thomas, A097987

Sysop: /* Judge withdrawing approval */

2024-05-19T00:03:49Z

Judge withdrawing approval

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:03, 19 May 2024
Line 23:		Line 23:

	People v. Cardoza (1984) 161 Cal.App.3d 40		People v. Cardoza (1984) 161 Cal.App.3d 40

			People v. Orin (1975) 13 CaL.3d 937

Sysop: /* Judge withdrawing approval */

2024-05-19T00:03:10Z

Judge withdrawing approval

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:03, 19 May 2024
Line 21:		Line 21:

	People v. Segura (2008) 44 Cal.4th 921		People v. Segura (2008) 44 Cal.4th 921

			People v. Cardoza (1984) 161 Cal.App.3d 40

Sysop: /* Judge withdrawing approval */

2024-05-19T00:02:01Z

Judge withdrawing approval

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:02, 19 May 2024
Line 17:		Line 17:

	People v. Martinez, F050714		People v. Martinez, F050714

			People v. Drummond, A119118

			People v. Segura (2008) 44 Cal.4th 921

Sysop at 23:59, 18 May 2024

2024-05-18T23:59:17Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:59, 18 May 2024
Line 6:		Line 6:

	“While plea bargaining offers an intelligent and economically necessary solution to the practical problems which arise in the administration of the criminal justice system, plea bargains themselves should not offend the fundamental notions of justice and criminal liability and accountability which underlie that system. Moreover, the practical benefits of plea bargaining should never outweigh the public's interest in the vigorous prosecution of the accused, the imposition of appropriate punishment, and the protection of victims of crimes.” People v. Cardoza (1984) 161 Cal.App.3d 40, 43:		“While plea bargaining offers an intelligent and economically necessary solution to the practical problems which arise in the administration of the criminal justice system, plea bargains themselves should not offend the fundamental notions of justice and criminal liability and accountability which underlie that system. Moreover, the practical benefits of plea bargaining should never outweigh the public's interest in the vigorous prosecution of the accused, the imposition of appropriate punishment, and the protection of victims of crimes.” People v. Cardoza (1984) 161 Cal.App.3d 40, 43:




			Clark v. Superior 2005 WL 2375165 F047630

			Since Mikhail involved a plea to a lesser included offense, that court had no occasion to discuss the effect of section 1192.1 et seq. on lesser related offenses. Accordingly, we construe that court's reference to “an unconditional plea to a lesser offense or degree than that originally charged” (Mikhail, supra, 13 Cal.App.4th at p. 857) as alluding to an unconditional plea to a lesser included offense.

			We note that here, unlike in Mikhail, the prosecutor did not object to the court's rejection of the plea. (See Mikhail, supra, 13 Cal.App.4th at pp. 851-852.)

			People v. Martinez, F050714

Sysop: /* Judge withdrawing approval */

2024-05-18T23:56:04Z

Judge withdrawing approval

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:56, 18 May 2024
Line 3:		Line 3:

	People v. Pixley [https://www.courts.ca.gov/opinions/documents/E075758.PDF]		People v. Pixley [https://www.courts.ca.gov/opinions/documents/E075758.PDF]


			“While plea bargaining offers an intelligent and economically necessary solution to the practical problems which arise in the administration of the criminal justice system, plea bargains themselves should not offend the fundamental notions of justice and criminal liability and accountability which underlie that system. Moreover, the practical benefits of plea bargaining should never outweigh the public's interest in the vigorous prosecution of the accused, the imposition of appropriate punishment, and the protection of victims of crimes.” People v. Cardoza (1984) 161 Cal.App.3d 40, 43:

Sysop: Created page with " ==Judge withdrawing approval== People v. Pixley [https://www.courts.ca.gov/opinions/documents/E075758.PDF]"

2022-03-08T02:53:58Z

Created page with " ==Judge withdrawing approval== People v. Pixley [https://www.courts.ca.gov/opinions/documents/E075758.PDF]"

New page

==Judge withdrawing approval==

People v. Pixley [https://www.courts.ca.gov/opinions/documents/E075758.PDF]