Strike - Revision history

Sysop: /* Timing of strike */

2026-07-31T22:29:17Z

Timing of strike

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:29, 31 July 2026
Line 158:		Line 158:

	The application of the Three Strikes law is triggered by the defendant's conviction of a strike offense prior to the commission of the current felony. (People v. Flood (2003) 108 Cal. App. 4th 504, 507-507.)		The application of the Three Strikes law is triggered by the defendant's conviction of a strike offense prior to the commission of the current felony. (People v. Flood (2003) 108 Cal. App. 4th 504, 507-507.)

			In the context of the Three Strikes law, the date of conviction is the date of the verdict or the plea of guilty and not the date of sentencing or judgment (People v. Castello (1998) 65 Cal. App. 4th 1242, 1253-1254).

Sysop at 18:04, 23 April 2026

2026-04-23T18:04:55Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:04, 23 April 2026
Line 154:		Line 154:

	PC1192.7(c)(23) use of personal weapon does not require that a PC12022(b) be charged. (''People v. Equarte'' (1986) 42 Cal.3d 456.)		PC1192.7(c)(23) use of personal weapon does not require that a PC12022(b) be charged. (''People v. Equarte'' (1986) 42 Cal.3d 456.)

			==Timing of strike==

			The application of the Three Strikes law is triggered by the defendant's conviction of a strike offense prior to the commission of the current felony. (People v. Flood (2003) 108 Cal. App. 4th 504, 507-507.)

Sysop: /* Plead and proven */

2026-01-16T20:42:14Z

Plead and proven

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:42, 16 January 2026
Line 152:		Line 152:

	Strikes priors don't have to be proven up at preliminary examination if not an element of the crime. (''Miranda v. Superior Court'' (1995) 38 Cal.App.4th 902.)		Strikes priors don't have to be proven up at preliminary examination if not an element of the crime. (''Miranda v. Superior Court'' (1995) 38 Cal.App.4th 902.)

			PC1192.7(c)(23) use of personal weapon does not require that a PC12022(b) be charged. (''People v. Equarte'' (1986) 42 Cal.3d 456.)

Sysop: /* Crimes */

2025-12-02T07:07:34Z

Crimes

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:07, 2 December 2025
Line 69:		Line 69:
	\|PC246\|\|Discharge of a firearm at an inhabited dwelling, vehicle, or aircraft\|\|Maybe, PC1192.7(c)(33)\|\|No\|\|Maybe, 707(b)(15)\|\|Does not include occupied building		\|PC246\|\|Discharge of a firearm at an inhabited dwelling, vehicle, or aircraft\|\|Maybe, PC1192.7(c)(33)\|\|No\|\|Maybe, 707(b)(15)\|\|Does not include occupied building
	\|-		\|-
	\|PC246.3\|\|Negligent discharge of firearm\|\|Maybe, PC1192.7(c)(8), (c)(23)\|\|No\|\|No\|\|Not necessarily personal use. [https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=8509961924315210853 ''People v. Golde'' (2008) 163 Cal.App.4th 101]		\|PC246.3\|\|Negligent discharge of firearm\|\|Maybe, PC1192.7(c)(8), (c)(23)\|\|No\|\|No\|\|Not necessarily personal use. [https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=8509961924315210853 ''People v. Golde'' (2008) 163 Cal.App.4th 101], ''People v. Leslie'' (1996) 47 Cal.App.4th 198.
	\|-		\|-
	\|PC261\|\|Rape\|\|Yes, PC1192.7(c)(3)\|\|Yes for (1), (2), (4), (6), PC667.5(c)(3)\|\|Maybe, 707(b)(4)		\|PC261\|\|Rape\|\|Yes, PC1192.7(c)(3)\|\|Yes for (1), (2), (4), (6), PC667.5(c)(3)\|\|Maybe, 707(b)(4)

Sysop: /* Crimes */

2025-05-01T00:49:19Z

Crimes

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:49, 1 May 2025
Line 96:		Line 96:
	\|-		\|-
	\|PC451\|\|Arson\|\|Yes, PC1192.7(c)(14)\|\|Yes for only (a) and (b), PC667.5(c)(10)\|\|Yes for only (a) and (b), 707(b)(2)		\|PC451\|\|Arson\|\|Yes, PC1192.7(c)(14)\|\|Yes for only (a) and (b), PC667.5(c)(10)\|\|Yes for only (a) and (b), 707(b)(2)
			\|-
			\|PC455\|\|Attempted arson\|\|Yes, PC1192.7(c)(27)\|\|No\|\|No\|\|[https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=9402346688607707451 ''People v. Flores'' (1995) 39 Cal.App.4th 1811]
	\|-		\|-
	\|PC459<BR>PC460(a)\|\|First-degree Burglary\|\|Yes, PC1192.7(c)(18)\|\|Maybe, PC667.5(c)(21)\|\|No\|\|Violent if pleaded and proven that another person, other than accomplice, was present, aka "hot prowl"		\|PC459<BR>PC460(a)\|\|First-degree Burglary\|\|Yes, PC1192.7(c)(18)\|\|Maybe, PC667.5(c)(21)\|\|No\|\|Violent if pleaded and proven that another person, other than accomplice, was present, aka "hot prowl"

Sysop at 02:23, 30 March 2025

2025-03-30T02:23:57Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:23, 30 March 2025
Line 146:		Line 146:

	“It is further alleged that in the commission and attempted commission of the foregoing offense, the defendant ____, personally [inflicted great bodily injury on another person, other than an accomplice] [used a firearm, to wit: ____,] [used a dangerous and deadly weapon, to wit: ____,] within the meaning of Sections 667 and 1192.7 of the Penal Code.”		“It is further alleged that in the commission and attempted commission of the foregoing offense, the defendant ____, personally [inflicted great bodily injury on another person, other than an accomplice] [used a firearm, to wit: ____,] [used a dangerous and deadly weapon, to wit: ____,] within the meaning of Sections 667 and 1192.7 of the Penal Code.”

			==Plead and proven==

			Strikes priors don't have to be proven up at preliminary examination if not an element of the crime. (''Miranda v. Superior Court'' (1995) 38 Cal.App.4th 902.)

Sysop: /* Crimes */

2024-12-21T20:46:58Z

Crimes

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:46, 21 December 2024
Line 132:		Line 132:
	\|-		\|-
	\|HSC11380(a)\|\|Furnishing PCP or methamphetamines to minor\|\|Yes, PC1192.7(c)(23)\|\|No\|\|No		\|HSC11380(a)\|\|Furnishing PCP or methamphetamines to minor\|\|Yes, PC1192.7(c)(23)\|\|No\|\|No
			\|-
			\|VC20001(b)\|\|Hit-and-run with injury\|\|Probably not under PC1192.7(c)(8)\|\|No\|\|No\|\|[https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=16282966261664515424 ''People v. Wood'' (2000) 83 Cal.App.4th 862]
	\|}		\|}

Sysop at 16:43, 6 July 2024

2024-07-06T16:43:19Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:43, 6 July 2024
Line 97:		Line 97:
	\|PC451\|\|Arson\|\|Yes, PC1192.7(c)(14)\|\|Yes for only (a) and (b), PC667.5(c)(10)\|\|Yes for only (a) and (b), 707(b)(2)		\|PC451\|\|Arson\|\|Yes, PC1192.7(c)(14)\|\|Yes for only (a) and (b), PC667.5(c)(10)\|\|Yes for only (a) and (b), 707(b)(2)
	\|-		\|-
	\|PC459<BR>PC460(a)\|\|First-degree Burglary\|\|PC1192.7(c)(18)\|\|Maybe, PC667.5(c)(21)\|\|No\|\|Violent if pleaded and proven that another person, other than accomplice, was present, aka "hot prowl"		\|PC459<BR>PC460(a)\|\|First-degree Burglary\|\|Yes, PC1192.7(c)(18)\|\|Maybe, PC667.5(c)(21)\|\|No\|\|Violent if pleaded and proven that another person, other than accomplice, was present, aka "hot prowl"
	\|-		\|-
	\|PC487(d)(2)\|\|Grand theft firearm\|\|Yes, PC1192.7(c)(26)\|\|No\|\|No		\|PC487(d)(2)\|\|Grand theft firearm\|\|Yes, PC1192.7(c)(26)\|\|No\|\|No

Sysop at 16:42, 6 July 2024

2024-07-06T16:42:53Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:42, 6 July 2024
Line 97:		Line 97:
	\|PC451\|\|Arson\|\|Yes, PC1192.7(c)(14)\|\|Yes for only (a) and (b), PC667.5(c)(10)\|\|Yes for only (a) and (b), 707(b)(2)		\|PC451\|\|Arson\|\|Yes, PC1192.7(c)(14)\|\|Yes for only (a) and (b), PC667.5(c)(10)\|\|Yes for only (a) and (b), 707(b)(2)
	\|-		\|-
	\|PC459<BR>PC460(a)\|\|First-degree Burglary\|\|~~Yes~~\|\|Maybe, PC667.5(c)(21)\|\|No\|\|Violent if pleaded and proven that another person, other than accomplice, was present, aka "hot prowl"		\|PC459<BR>PC460(a)\|\|First-degree Burglary\|\|PC1192.7(c)(18)\|\|Maybe, PC667.5(c)(21)\|\|No\|\|Violent if pleaded and proven that another person, other than accomplice, was present, aka "hot prowl"
	\|-		\|-
	\|PC487(d)(2)\|\|Grand theft firearm\|\|Yes, PC1192.7(c)(26)\|\|No\|\|No		\|PC487(d)(2)\|\|Grand theft firearm\|\|Yes, PC1192.7(c)(26)\|\|No\|\|No

Sysop at 22:12, 27 November 2023

2023-11-27T22:12:55Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:12, 27 November 2023
Line 47:		Line 47:
	\|PC220\|\|Assault with intent to commit specified felony\|\|Maybe, PC1192.7(c)(10), (29)\|\|Yes, PC667.5(c)(15)\|\|Maybe\|\|Does not include assault with intent to commit PC264.1, PC286, PC288, PC288a, PC289		\|PC220\|\|Assault with intent to commit specified felony\|\|Maybe, PC1192.7(c)(10), (29)\|\|Yes, PC667.5(c)(15)\|\|Maybe\|\|Does not include assault with intent to commit PC264.1, PC286, PC288, PC288a, PC289
	\|-		\|-
	\|PC243(d)\|\|Battery with SBI\|\|Maybe, PC1192.7(c)(8)\|\|No\|\|Maybe, 707(b)(14)\|\|GBI both is and is not the same as SBI. And not necessarily personally inflicted. <BR>[https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=1683675228826196701 ''People v. Bueno'' (2006) 143 Cal.App.4th ~~1053~~]<BR>''People v. Taylor'' (2004) 118 Cal.App.4th 11<BR>''People v. Moore'' (1992) 10 Cal.App.4th 1868.<BR>[https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=2237521241125044486 ''People v. Johnson'' (2016) 244 Cal.App.4th 384]. For 707(b), see ''People v. Fountain'' (2000) 82 Cal.App.4th 61.		\|PC243(d)\|\|Battery with SBI\|\|Maybe, PC1192.7(c)(8)\|\|No\|\|Maybe, 707(b)(14)\|\|GBI both is and is not the same as SBI. And not necessarily personally inflicted. <BR>[https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=1683675228826196701 ''People v. Bueno'' (2006) 143 Cal.App.4th 1503]<BR>''People v. Taylor'' (2004) 118 Cal.App.4th 11<BR>''People v. Moore'' (1992) 10 Cal.App.4th 1868.<BR>[https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=2237521241125044486 ''People v. Johnson'' (2016) 244 Cal.App.4th 384]. For 707(b), see ''People v. Fountain'' (2000) 82 Cal.App.4th 61.
	\|-		\|-
	\|PC244\|\|Throwing acid or flammable substances\|\|Maybe, PC1192.7(c)(30)\|\|No\|\|No		\|PC244\|\|Throwing acid or flammable substances\|\|Maybe, PC1192.7(c)(30)\|\|No\|\|No