Strike: Difference between revisions

From California Criminal Law Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 92: Line 92:
|-
|-
|PC459<BR>PC460(a)||First-degree Burglary||Yes||Maybe||PC667.5(c)||(21)||If pleaded and proven that another person, other than accomplice, was present. aka "hot prowl"
|PC459<BR>PC460(a)||First-degree Burglary||Yes||Maybe||PC667.5(c)||(21)||If pleaded and proven that another person, other than accomplice, was present. aka "hot prowl"
|-
|PC487(d)(2)||Grand theft firearm||Yes, PC1192.7(c)(26)||No
|-
|-
|PC11418(b) or (c)||Use of weapon of mass destruction||Yes||Yes||PC667.5(c)||(23)
|PC11418(b) or (c)||Use of weapon of mass destruction||Yes||Yes||PC667.5(c)||(23)

Revision as of 01:54, 3 October 2021

Crimes

Code Crime Serious? Violent? Notes
PC37 Treason Yes, PC1192.7(c)(7) Yes, PC667.5(c)(7)
PC128 Perjury resulting in execution of innocent person Yes, PC1192.7(c)(7) Yes, PC667.5(c)(7)
PC136.1 Intimidation of victims or witnesses Yes, PC1192.7(c)(37) No 'People v. Neely (2004) 124 Cal.App.4th 274 held any felony violation of any of 136.1 as serious.
PC148.10 Resisting police officer with SBI or death to officer Maybe, PC1192.7(c)(8) No People v. Rodriguez (1999) 69 Cal.App.4th 341; Personally inflicting serious injury is serious, but 148.10 can be violated by proximately causing injury
PC186.22 Gang offense Yes, PC1192.7(c)(28) No People v. Briceno (2004) 34 Cal.4th 451, held that both PC186.22(a) crime and PC186.22(b) enhancement are serious.
PC187 Murder Yes, PC1192.7(C)(1) Yes, PC667.5(c)(1)
PC187/PC664 Attempted murder Yes, PC1192.7(c)(9) Yes, PC667.5(c)(12)
PC191.5 Gross vehicular manslaughter Maybe, PC1192.7(c)(8) No People v. Wilson (2013) 219 Cal.App.4th 500, PC1192.8
People v. Gonzales (1994) 29 Cal.App.4th 1684
PC192(a) Voluntary manslaughter Yes, PC1192.7(c)(1) Yes, PC667.5(c)(1)
PC192(b) Involuntary manslaughter No No People v. Cook (1984) 158 Cal.App.3d 948
PC192(C)(1) Gross vehicular manslaughter Maybe, under PC1192.7(c)(8) No To be serious, must prove personal infliction of GBI to non-accomplice
People v. Marin (2015) 240 Cal.App.4th 1344, 1350–1351
PC1192.8
People v. Gonzales (1994) 29 Cal.App.4th 1684
PC203 Mayhem Yes, PC1192.7(c)(2) Yes, PC667.5(c)(2)
PC205 Aggravated mayhem Yes, PC1192.7(c)(2), (7) Yes, PC667.5(c)(2),(7)
PC206 Torture Yes, PC1192.7(c)(7),(8) Yes, PC667.5(c)(7),(8)
PC207 Kidnapping Yes, PC1192.7(c)(20) Yes, PC667.5(c)(14)
PC209 Kidnapping for ransom Yes Yes PC667.5(c)(14)
PC209.5 Kidnapping during carjacking Yes, PC1192.7(c)(20), (27) Yes, PC667.5(c)(14)
PC211 Robbery Yes, PC1192.7(c)(19) Yes, PC667.5(c)(9)
PC215 Carjacking Yes, PC1192.7(c)(27) Yes, PC667.5(c)(17)
PC220 Assault with intent to commit specified felony Maybe, PC1192.7(c)(10), (29) Yes, PC667.5(c)(15) Does not include assault with intent to commit PC264.1, PC286, PC288, PC288a, PC289
PC243(d) Battery with SBI Maybe, PC1192.7(c)(8) No GBI is not the same as SBI. And not necessarily personally inflicted.
People v. Bueno (2006) 143 Cal.App.4th 1053
People v. Taylor (2004) 118 Cal.App.4th 11
People v. Moore (1992) 10 Cal.App.4th 1868
PC244 Throwing acid or flammable substances Maybe, PC1192.7(c)(30) No
PC245(a)(1) Assault with a deadly weapon Yes, PC1192.7(c)(31) No Use of firearm does not have to be personal.[1]
PC245(a)(2) Assault with a firearm Yes, PC1192.7(31) People v. Myers (2007) 148 Cal.App.4th 546, Use of firearm does not have to be personal.[1]
PC245(a)(4),former PC245(a)(1) Assault with means likely to produce GBI No No People v. Haykel (2002) 96 Cal.App.4th 146
People v. Winters (2001) 93 Cal.App.4th 273
Williams v. Superior Court (2001) 92 Cal.App.4th 612.
PC245(b) Assault with a semiautomatic firearm Yes, PC1182.7(c)(8), (23), or (31) No People v. Le (2015) 61 Cal.4th 416
Use of firearm does not have to be personal.[1]
PC245(c) or (d) Assault with deadly weapon or firearm on police officer Yes, PC1192.7(c)(11) No Does not include assault on firefighter
PC245.2 Assault with a deadly weapon against a public transit employee Maybe, PC1192.7(c)(32) No Does not include assault with means likely to produce GBI
PC245.3 Assault with a deadly weapon against a custodial officer Maybe, PC1192.7(c)(32) No Does not include assault with means likely to produce GBI
PC245.5 Assault with a deadly weapon against a school employee Maybe, PC1192.7(c)(32) No Does not include assault with means likely to produce GBI
PC246 Discharge of a firearm at an inhabited dwelling, vehicle, or aircraft Maybe, PC1192.7(c)(33) No Does not include occupied building
PC261(a)(1),(2),(4) or (6) Rape Yes, PC1192.7(c)(3) Yes for (1), (2), (4), (6), PC667.5(c)(3)
PC264.1 Rape in concert Yes, PC1192.7(c)(34) Yes, PC667.5(c)(18)
PC286(c) Sodomy on child <14 years old Yes, PC1192.7(c)(6) Yes,PC667.5(c)(4) People v. Murphy (2001) 25 Cal.4th 136
PC286(d) Sodomy Yes Yes PC667.5(c) (4)
PC288(a) Lewd and lascivious act on child <14 years old Yes Yes PC667.5(c) (6)
PC288(b) Lewd and lascivious act on child <14 years old Yes Yes PC667.5(c) (6)
PC288a(c) Oral copulation on child <14 years old Yes Yes PC667.5(c) (5)
PC288a(d) oral copulation Yes Yes PC667.5(c) (5)
PC288.5 Continuous sexual abuse of a child Yes Yes PC667.5(c) (16)
PC289(a) Sexual penetration Yes Yes PC667.5(c) (11)
PC289(j) Sexual penetration on child <14 years old Yes Yes PC667.5(c) (11)
PC451(a) or (b) Arson Yes Yes PC667.5(c) (10)
PC459
PC460(a)
First-degree Burglary Yes Maybe PC667.5(c) (21) If pleaded and proven that another person, other than accomplice, was present. aka "hot prowl"
PC487(d)(2) Grand theft firearm Yes, PC1192.7(c)(26) No
PC11418(b) or (c) Use of weapon of mass destruction Yes Yes PC667.5(c) (23)
PC12022.53 Firearm sentence enhancement Yes Yes PC667.5(c) (22)
PC18745 exploding a destructive device or any explosive with intent to murder Yes Yes PC667.5(c) (13)
PC18750 Exploding a destructive device or any explosive causing bodily injury Yes Yes PC667.5(c) (13)
PC18750 Exploding a destructive device or any explosive causing GBI or death Yes Yes PC667.5(c) (13)
  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 People v. Luna (2003) 113 Cal.App.4th 395, 398, disapproved on other grounds in People v. Delgado (2008) 43 Cal.4th 1059, 1070, fn. 4.)