Parole: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Failure of the court to advise defendant that he will be on parole after prison is not prejudicial. (People v. McMillon (1992) 2 Cal.App.4th 1363.) | |||
==Length of parole== | |||
==Parole Conditions== | |||
In re David (2012) 202 Cal.App.4th 675 [ | |||
==Youth Offender Parole== | ==Youth Offender Parole== | ||
Revision as of 04:05, 24 June 2024
Failure of the court to advise defendant that he will be on parole after prison is not prejudicial. (People v. McMillon (1992) 2 Cal.App.4th 1363.)
Length of parole
Parole Conditions
In re David (2012) 202 Cal.App.4th 675 [
Youth Offender Parole
- In re Trejo (2017) 10 Cal.App.5th 972
- In re Williams (2018) 24 Cal.App.5th 794
- In re Bolton (2019) 40 Cal.App.5th 611