Parole

Failure of the court to advise defendant that he will be on parole after prison could be not prejudicial. (People v. McMillon (1992) 2 Cal.App.4th 1363.)

But failure of the court to advise defendant that he will be on parole after prison could be prejudicial. (In re Carabes (1983) 144 Cal.App.3d 927.)

A court may transfer from parole to PRCS (People v. Johnson (2020) 45 Cal.App.5th 379; People v. Ruiz (2020) 59 Cal.App.5th 372.)

Length of parole

People v. Tilley (2023) 92 Cal.App.5th 772 [The sentencing court does not have authority to set or alter the applicable term of parole so established.]

sequence **345 of a felony conviction and prison term.” (Ibid.) It need not be charged or alleged, and “[n]either the prosecution nor the sentencing court has the authority to alter the applicable term of parole established by the Legislature. [Citations.]” (In re Moser (1993) 6 Cal.4th 342, 357, 24 Cal.Rptr.2d 723, 862 P.2d 723, fn. omitted.) People v. VonWahlde (2016) 3 Cal.App.5th 1187, 1197 [220 Cal.Rptr.3d 337, 344–345]

People v. Avila (1994) 24 Cal.App.4th 1455. Parole period cannot be part of plea bargain.

In re Moser (1983) 6 Cal.4th 342

Watson v. Clarke (9th Cir. 2002) 28 Fed. Appx. 678

People v. Espinoza (2014) 226 Cal.App.4th 635

In re Sosa (1980) 102 Cal.App.3d 1002

People v. Tan (2021) 68 Cal.App.5th 1

Parole Conditions

In re David (2012) 202 Cal.App.4th 675

People v. Austin (2019) 35 Cal.App.5th 778.

People v. Burgener (1986) 41 Cal.3d 505

Kevin R. v. Superior Court (2010) 191 Cal.App.4th 676

Youth Offender Parole

• In re Trejo (2017) 10 Cal.App.5th 972

• In re Williams (2018) 24 Cal.App.5th 794

• In re Bolton (2019) 40 Cal.App.5th 611