Taser: Difference between revisions

Latest revision as of 05:26, 17 May 2017

Redirect to:

Revision as of 07:38, 3 September 2014 (view source) Sysop (talk \| contribs) (Created page with "Current models of Tasers use compressed nitrogen gas to propel darts which carry an electrical charge. Under old caselaw, People v. Heffner (1977) 70 Cal.App.3d 643, Tasers we...")		Latest revision as of 05:26, 17 May 2017 (view source) Sysop (talk \| contribs) (Redirected page to Stun gun)
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Current models of Tasers use compressed nitrogen gas to propel darts which carry an electrical charge. Under old caselaw, People v. Heffner (1977) 70 Cal.App.3d 643, Tasers were considered to be firearms. However, the reasoning of Heffner should no longer apply. Firearms have been defined in Californian law, as a device which expels a projectile by the force of an explosion. The Taser in question in Heffner, a no-longer-used model called the TF-1, used gunpowder to propel the darts, which fits the definition of a firearm. However, current Tasers use compressed nitrogen gas specifically so they won't be considered firearms. Nonetheless, a recent case, People v. Ortiz (2012) 208 Cal.App.4th 1354 cited ''Heffner'' for the proposition that a Taser is a firearm.		#REDIRECT [[Stun gun]]