Restitution: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "'''Restitution''' Non-economic damages. (''People v. Lehman'' (May 25, 2016, No. A144800) ___ Cal.App.4th ___, available at [http://www.courts.ca.gov/opinions/documents/A1448...") |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Non-economic damages. (''People v. Lehman'' (May 25, 2016, No. A144800) ___ Cal.App.4th ___, available at [http://www.courts.ca.gov/opinions/documents/A144800.PDF].) | Non-economic damages. (''People v. Lehman'' (May 25, 2016, No. A144800) ___ Cal.App.4th ___, available at [http://www.courts.ca.gov/opinions/documents/A144800.PDF].) | ||
"[A] trial court does not have jurisdiction to modify a defendant's probation to impose restitution after the defendant's probationary term has expired." (''Hilton v. Superior Court (2014) 239 Cal.App.4th 766.) | |||
Revision as of 23:17, 21 August 2016
Restitution
Non-economic damages. (People v. Lehman (May 25, 2016, No. A144800) ___ Cal.App.4th ___, available at [1].)
"[A] trial court does not have jurisdiction to modify a defendant's probation to impose restitution after the defendant's probationary term has expired." (Hilton v. Superior Court (2014) 239 Cal.App.4th 766.)