Search and Seizure: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with " A custodial arrest for a fine-only offense does not violate the Fourth Amendment. (''People v. McKay'' (2002) 27 Cal.4th 601, 606.) Violation of state statutes for arrest do...") |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
Violation of state statutes for arrest does not violate the Fourth Amendment. (''People v. McKay'' (2002) 27 Cal.4th 601, 606.) | Violation of state statutes for arrest does not violate the Fourth Amendment. (''People v. McKay'' (2002) 27 Cal.4th 601, 606.) | ||
==Detention== | |||
A detention may occur for a future crime that is about to occur. (''People v. Ellis'' (1993) 14 Cal.App.4th 1198; ''People v. Aldridge'' (1984) 35 Cal.3d 473, 478.) | |||
Revision as of 01:27, 3 September 2019
A custodial arrest for a fine-only offense does not violate the Fourth Amendment. (People v. McKay (2002) 27 Cal.4th 601, 606.)
Violation of state statutes for arrest does not violate the Fourth Amendment. (People v. McKay (2002) 27 Cal.4th 601, 606.)
Detention
A detention may occur for a future crime that is about to occur. (People v. Ellis (1993) 14 Cal.App.4th 1198; People v. Aldridge (1984) 35 Cal.3d 473, 478.)