Trial publicity: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with " State v. Avery, 374 S.C. 524, 649 S.E.2d 102 (Ct. App. 2007) (venue change denied where a vast majority of potential jurors recalled nothing about defendant and could remember only that crime had been committed.)") |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
State v. Avery, 374 S.C. 524, 649 S.E.2d 102 (Ct. App. 2007) (venue change denied where a vast majority of potential jurors recalled nothing about defendant and could remember only that crime had been committed.) | State v. Avery, 374 S.C. 524, 649 S.E.2d 102 (Ct. App. 2007) (venue change denied where a vast majority of potential jurors recalled nothing about defendant and could remember only that crime had been committed.) | ||
Gag order in Scott Peterson case and Michale Jackson case. | |||
Revision as of 01:47, 23 May 2022
State v. Avery, 374 S.C. 524, 649 S.E.2d 102 (Ct. App. 2007) (venue change denied where a vast majority of potential jurors recalled nothing about defendant and could remember only that crime had been committed.)
Gag order in Scott Peterson case and Michale Jackson case.