Double jeopardy: Difference between revisions

From California Criminal Law Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 25: Line 25:


* People v. Jackson (1936) 24 Cal.App.2d 182
* People v. Jackson (1936) 24 Cal.App.2d 182
==Duplicative filings==
PC1387
Berardi v. Superior Court (2008) 160 Cal.App.4th 210
“A procedure to dismiss one of those duplicative accessory pleadings is for the trial court to consolidate those pleadings and then dismiss the duplicate counts alleged in the consolidated pleadings.”
People v. Cassio (1977) 76 Cal.App.3d 369
Cassio
Schlosser

Revision as of 17:49, 12 July 2023

Double jeopardy


  • People v. Mason (1962) 200 Cal.App.2d 282
  • People v. Bell (2015) 241 Cal.App.4th 315
  • People v. Vigghiany (1960) 181 Cal.App.2d 621
  • People v. Conson (1925) 72 Cal.App. 509.
  • People v. Burkhart (1936) 5 Cal.2d 641
  • People v. O'Leary (1888) 77 Cal.30
  • Ex Parte Berman (1930) 104 Cal.App. 259
  • People v. Gonzalez (2015) 241 Cal.App.4th 1103
  • People v. Sanchez (2020) 49 Cal.App.5th 961
  • People v. Braum (2020) 49 Cal.App.5th 342
  • People v. Precaido (1916) 31 Cal.App. 519)
  • People v. Jackson (1936) 24 Cal.App.2d 182

Duplicative filings

PC1387

Berardi v. Superior Court (2008) 160 Cal.App.4th 210

“A procedure to dismiss one of those duplicative accessory pleadings is for the trial court to consolidate those pleadings and then dismiss the duplicate counts alleged in the consolidated pleadings.”

People v. Cassio (1977) 76 Cal.App.3d 369

Cassio

Schlosser