Double jeopardy: Difference between revisions

From California Criminal Law Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 34: Line 34:
“A procedure to dismiss one of those duplicative accessory pleadings is for the trial court to consolidate those pleadings and then dismiss the duplicate counts alleged in the consolidated pleadings.”
“A procedure to dismiss one of those duplicative accessory pleadings is for the trial court to consolidate those pleadings and then dismiss the duplicate counts alleged in the consolidated pleadings.”


People v. Cassio (1977) 76 Cal.App.3d 369
==Information and indictments==


Cassio
People v. Cossio (1977) 76 Cal.App.3d 369


Schlosser
People v. Schlosser (1978) 77 Cal.App.3d 1007
 
People v. Martinez (1993) 19 Cal.App.4th 738

Revision as of 17:51, 12 July 2023

Double jeopardy


  • People v. Mason (1962) 200 Cal.App.2d 282
  • People v. Bell (2015) 241 Cal.App.4th 315
  • People v. Vigghiany (1960) 181 Cal.App.2d 621
  • People v. Conson (1925) 72 Cal.App. 509.
  • People v. Burkhart (1936) 5 Cal.2d 641
  • People v. O'Leary (1888) 77 Cal.30
  • Ex Parte Berman (1930) 104 Cal.App. 259
  • People v. Gonzalez (2015) 241 Cal.App.4th 1103
  • People v. Sanchez (2020) 49 Cal.App.5th 961
  • People v. Braum (2020) 49 Cal.App.5th 342
  • People v. Precaido (1916) 31 Cal.App. 519)
  • People v. Jackson (1936) 24 Cal.App.2d 182

Duplicative filings

PC1387

Berardi v. Superior Court (2008) 160 Cal.App.4th 210

“A procedure to dismiss one of those duplicative accessory pleadings is for the trial court to consolidate those pleadings and then dismiss the duplicate counts alleged in the consolidated pleadings.”

Information and indictments

People v. Cossio (1977) 76 Cal.App.3d 369

People v. Schlosser (1978) 77 Cal.App.3d 1007

People v. Martinez (1993) 19 Cal.App.4th 738