Double jeopardy: Difference between revisions

From California Criminal Law Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
Line 33: Line 33:


“A procedure to dismiss one of those duplicative accessory pleadings is for the trial court to consolidate those pleadings and then dismiss the duplicate counts alleged in the consolidated pleadings.”
“A procedure to dismiss one of those duplicative accessory pleadings is for the trial court to consolidate those pleadings and then dismiss the duplicate counts alleged in the consolidated pleadings.”
People v. Rodriguez (2013) 217 Cal.App.4th 326


People v. Elias (1990) 218 Cal.App.3d 1161 - “A statutory procedure which would achieve the desired result of disposing of the duplicate complaint would be to consolidate the pleadings under the newly filed complaint number as two counts and then strike one count.”
People v. Elias (1990) 218 Cal.App.3d 1161 - “A statutory procedure which would achieve the desired result of disposing of the duplicate complaint would be to consolidate the pleadings under the newly filed complaint number as two counts and then strike one count.”
Line 41: Line 43:


People v. Boyle (19920 4 Cal.App.4th 400
People v. Boyle (19920 4 Cal.App.4th 400


==Information and indictments==
==Information and indictments==

Revision as of 18:10, 12 July 2023

Double jeopardy


  • People v. Mason (1962) 200 Cal.App.2d 282
  • People v. Bell (2015) 241 Cal.App.4th 315
  • People v. Vigghiany (1960) 181 Cal.App.2d 621
  • People v. Conson (1925) 72 Cal.App. 509.
  • People v. Burkhart (1936) 5 Cal.2d 641
  • People v. O'Leary (1888) 77 Cal.30
  • Ex Parte Berman (1930) 104 Cal.App. 259
  • People v. Gonzalez (2015) 241 Cal.App.4th 1103
  • People v. Sanchez (2020) 49 Cal.App.5th 961
  • People v. Braum (2020) 49 Cal.App.5th 342
  • People v. Precaido (1916) 31 Cal.App. 519)
  • People v. Jackson (1936) 24 Cal.App.2d 182

Duplicative filings

PC1387

Berardi v. Superior Court (2008) 160 Cal.App.4th 210

“A procedure to dismiss one of those duplicative accessory pleadings is for the trial court to consolidate those pleadings and then dismiss the duplicate counts alleged in the consolidated pleadings.”

People v. Rodriguez (2013) 217 Cal.App.4th 326

People v. Elias (1990) 218 Cal.App.3d 1161 - “A statutory procedure which would achieve the desired result of disposing of the duplicate complaint would be to consolidate the pleadings under the newly filed complaint number as two counts and then strike one count.”

Mins v. Superior Court in and for Sutter County (1955) 137 Cal.App.2d 728

People v. Superior Court (Martinez) (1993) 19 Cal.App.4th 738

People v. Boyle (19920 4 Cal.App.4th 400

Information and indictments

People v. Cossio (1977) 76 Cal.App.3d 369

People v. Schlosser (1978) 77 Cal.App.3d 1007