Double jeopardy: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
Line 33: | Line 33: | ||
“A procedure to dismiss one of those duplicative accessory pleadings is for the trial court to consolidate those pleadings and then dismiss the duplicate counts alleged in the consolidated pleadings.” | “A procedure to dismiss one of those duplicative accessory pleadings is for the trial court to consolidate those pleadings and then dismiss the duplicate counts alleged in the consolidated pleadings.” | ||
People v. Rodriguez (2013) 217 Cal.App.4th 326 | |||
People v. Elias (1990) 218 Cal.App.3d 1161 - “A statutory procedure which would achieve the desired result of disposing of the duplicate complaint would be to consolidate the pleadings under the newly filed complaint number as two counts and then strike one count.” | People v. Elias (1990) 218 Cal.App.3d 1161 - “A statutory procedure which would achieve the desired result of disposing of the duplicate complaint would be to consolidate the pleadings under the newly filed complaint number as two counts and then strike one count.” | ||
Line 41: | Line 43: | ||
People v. Boyle (19920 4 Cal.App.4th 400 | People v. Boyle (19920 4 Cal.App.4th 400 | ||
==Information and indictments== | ==Information and indictments== |
Revision as of 18:10, 12 July 2023
Double jeopardy
- People v. Mason (1962) 200 Cal.App.2d 282
- People v. Bell (2015) 241 Cal.App.4th 315
- People v. Vigghiany (1960) 181 Cal.App.2d 621
- People v. Conson (1925) 72 Cal.App. 509.
- People v. Burkhart (1936) 5 Cal.2d 641
- People v. O'Leary (1888) 77 Cal.30
- Ex Parte Berman (1930) 104 Cal.App. 259
- People v. Gonzalez (2015) 241 Cal.App.4th 1103
- People v. Sanchez (2020) 49 Cal.App.5th 961
- People v. Braum (2020) 49 Cal.App.5th 342
- People v. Precaido (1916) 31 Cal.App. 519)
- People v. Jackson (1936) 24 Cal.App.2d 182
Duplicative filings
PC1387
Berardi v. Superior Court (2008) 160 Cal.App.4th 210
“A procedure to dismiss one of those duplicative accessory pleadings is for the trial court to consolidate those pleadings and then dismiss the duplicate counts alleged in the consolidated pleadings.”
People v. Rodriguez (2013) 217 Cal.App.4th 326
People v. Elias (1990) 218 Cal.App.3d 1161 - “A statutory procedure which would achieve the desired result of disposing of the duplicate complaint would be to consolidate the pleadings under the newly filed complaint number as two counts and then strike one count.”
Mins v. Superior Court in and for Sutter County (1955) 137 Cal.App.2d 728
People v. Superior Court (Martinez) (1993) 19 Cal.App.4th 738
People v. Boyle (19920 4 Cal.App.4th 400
Information and indictments
People v. Cossio (1977) 76 Cal.App.3d 369
People v. Schlosser (1978) 77 Cal.App.3d 1007