Arraignment: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with " Penal Code 988 Penal Code 990 Furthermore, it is our opinion that the arraignment includes the plea and is not completed until the plea is entered. (People v. Terry (1970) 14 Cal.App.3d Supp. 1, 4.) Municipal court rule may not require attendance of deputy district attorney at all arraignment proceedings, applications for bail and hearings on diversion eligibility. 75 Op.Atty.Gen. 51, 3-18-92.") |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
Furthermore, it is our opinion that the arraignment includes the plea and is not completed until the plea is entered. (People v. Terry (1970) 14 Cal.App.3d Supp. 1, 4.) | Furthermore, it is our opinion that the arraignment includes the plea and is not completed until the plea is entered. (People v. Terry (1970) 14 Cal.App.3d Supp. 1, 4.) | ||
Conviction should not be vacated if arraignment not timely. (People v. Lollis (1960) 177 Cal. App. 2d 665, 671, disapproved of on other grounds by People v. Perez (1965) 62 Cal. 2d 769.) | |||
Municipal court rule may not require attendance of deputy district attorney at all arraignment proceedings, applications for bail and hearings on diversion eligibility. 75 Op.Atty.Gen. 51, 3-18-92. | Municipal court rule may not require attendance of deputy district attorney at all arraignment proceedings, applications for bail and hearings on diversion eligibility. 75 Op.Atty.Gen. 51, 3-18-92. | ||
Latest revision as of 02:26, 17 February 2025
Penal Code 988
Penal Code 990
Furthermore, it is our opinion that the arraignment includes the plea and is not completed until the plea is entered. (People v. Terry (1970) 14 Cal.App.3d Supp. 1, 4.)
Conviction should not be vacated if arraignment not timely. (People v. Lollis (1960) 177 Cal. App. 2d 665, 671, disapproved of on other grounds by People v. Perez (1965) 62 Cal. 2d 769.)
Municipal court rule may not require attendance of deputy district attorney at all arraignment proceedings, applications for bail and hearings on diversion eligibility. 75 Op.Atty.Gen. 51, 3-18-92.