Parole

From California Criminal Law Wiki
Revision as of 04:05, 24 June 2024 by Sysop (talk | contribs)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Failure of the court to advise defendant that he will be on parole after prison is not prejudicial. (People v. McMillon (1992) 2 Cal.App.4th 1363.)


Length of parole

Parole Conditions

In re David (2012) 202 Cal.App.4th 675 [


Youth Offender Parole

  • In re Trejo (2017) 10 Cal.App.5th 972
  • In re Williams (2018) 24 Cal.App.5th 794
  • In re Bolton (2019) 40 Cal.App.5th 611