Parole

From California Criminal Law Wiki
Revision as of 04:06, 24 June 2024 by Sysop (talk | contribs)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Failure of the court to advise defendant that he will be on parole after prison could be not prejudicial. (People v. McMillon (1992) 2 Cal.App.4th 1363.)

But failure of the court to advise defendant that he will be on parole after prison could be prejudicial. (In re Carabes (1983) 144 Cal.App.3d 927.)


Length of parole

Parole Conditions

In re David (2012) 202 Cal.App.4th 675 [


Youth Offender Parole

  • In re Trejo (2017) 10 Cal.App.5th 972
  • In re Williams (2018) 24 Cal.App.5th 794
  • In re Bolton (2019) 40 Cal.App.5th 611